Time flies when you’re having fun – we’re into the last week to take the annual survey!

By Selina Bruckner, Geoff Williams, Nathalie Steinhauer

The Bee Informed Partnership Colony Loss and Management Survey month is almost over – time flies when you’re having fun preventing swarming, installing packages, and adding your supers! Have you taken the survey yet? If not, don’t miss out on even more fun! This year’s survey is the shortest it’s ever been! Take the survey here.

Time also flies in terms of the years that the BIP survey has been conducted; it is celebrating its 15th birthday! The survey has come a long way since 2006. Here, we review some of the survey’s outputs so far.

In total, ten scientific articles documenting national colony losses in the United States have been published. Those publications are based on data that represent one of the largest collections of longitudinal honey bee colony loss data on the planet! Although the initial focus of the survey was to document winter losses, the survey has also been collecting information about summer losses since 2010. By doing so, we have seen that loss rates vary among seasons and years (Figure 1).

National total colony loss rates by season and year.
Figure 1: National total colony loss rates by season and year.

Not only that, but loss rates are also different for operations of different sizes. We differentiate among backyard beekeepers who manage 50 or less colonies, sideline (managing 51-500 colonies) and commercial beekeepers (managing 500+ colonies). Most of our survey participants are backyard beekeepers who generally experience the highest losses during the winter. Commercial beekeepers represent a small number of participants but own the vast majority of the colonies, and tend to lose colonies more evenly between summer and winter (Figure 2).

Average colony loss by operation size and season across the survey years 2010 -2020.
Figure 2: Average colony loss by operation size and season across the survey years 2010 -2020. Backyard beekeepers manage 50 or less colonies while sideliner and commercial beekeepers manage 51-500 and 500 or more colonies, respectively

Recruiting beekeepers to generate this sort of data is not as easy as one would think. In the early days of the survey, it was exclusively conducted over the phone which involved many talking minutes and restricted the number of beekeepers that could be interviewed. Therefore, an online survey was developed in 2009 to reach more beekeepers from all over the country. Efficient advertising in addition to different survey formats indeed increased the reach of the survey from 384 respondents in 2006 to a maximum of 7,535 in 2015  Similarly, survey respondents came from 23 of the 50 U.S. states in 2007, whereas beekeepers from every state answered the survey in 2013-14 (Figure 3). We really appreciate everyone that helps to distribute our survey each year via their networks!

Valid winter respondents per state for two survey years.
Figure 3: Valid winter respondents per state for two survey years. Grayed-out areas signify states in which no or less than five beekeepers answered the 2007-08 survey.

As a previous participant, you probably noticed that we only talked about the “Colony Loss” part so far. However, recent surveys actually consisted of three parts – “Colony Loss”, “Management” and “Socio-Economics”.
These additional sections have given us valuable insights. For example, the information was used to rank different management practices for different groups and regions (Figure 4 ) according to the highest expected reduction in colony loss if adopted by more beekeepers.

Ranked management practices for different beekeeper groups and regions
Figure 4: Ranked management practices for different beekeeper groups and regions. Beekeeper groups include small-scale (backyard) and large-scale (professional) operations. Management practices were ranked for small-scale beekeepers residing in the North versus the South of the United States, and for large-scale operations that keep colonies in one location (stationary) versus migratory operations. Practices at the top of the list are associated with the greatest reduction in colony loss if being implemented. ©Nathalie Steinhauer

Management practices employed and reported in the survey vary regionally and by operation size and beekeeper philosophy, especially in the area of Varroa management. It turns out there are some ‘treatment sceptics’ and ‘treatment adherents’ among us, according to a study by Thoms et al. (2019), which employed survey data. Large-scale operations consistently use synthetic control methods, whereas small-scale operations are more likely to apply a broader range of treatments including non-chemical interventions (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Varroa management practices for different beekeeper groups.
Figure 5:  Varroa management practices for different beekeeper groups. The majority of small-scale (backyard) beekeepers implements a combination of both chemical (Varroacide) and non-chemical varroa management, whereas most migratory (multi-state) large scale beekeepers only apply chemical treatment. © Ariela Haber

Most recently, we have made a big effort to address beekeeper feedback and make the survey shorter than ever before! Instead of tackling all management aspects at once, we decided to focus on one specific topic each year. As mentioned earlier, professional large-scale beekeepers tend to manage their hives differently than small-scale operations. Therefore, our team has developed a tailored survey version to better capture their information, as described in the previous survey-related blog post.

If you want to delve deeper in our past results, head over to the data explorer on the Bee Informed Partnership webpage. You can compare specific loss numbers (of your home state) over the years, see how different management practices and much more.

And in case you would like to contribute to this large collection of data, please take the survey or share the link with your peers. There are only a few days left!

Take the survey here

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Be Involved. Be Included.Bee Informed.

BIP →